# Orchestrator review

Actual model decisions for a light draft. No human approval or executed product test is implied.

Integrated both worker reviews as one bounded LIGHT proposal. Their coordinate findings agree; neither review establishes a working mechanism.

## Accepted

- Accept both workers' 84 mm jaw-face arithmetic and conditional 78 mm inward-pad opening.
- Accept their explicit X202..220 versus X212..228 opening-end overlap of 8 mm, and their warning about the rod endpoint.
- Accept the named-part BOM as a provisional 20-instance reconciliation only when four bushings are inferred.
- Accept the proposed ordering of interface review before CAD review and any later physical check.

## Changed

- Replace both workers' diagrams with one seven-node Mermaid flow. Its final node is a conditional check proposal, not an executed check.
- Keep four bushings visibly provisional in the BOM and geometry summary; the contract locks bushing dimensions but not quantity or placement.
- Treat the jaw-to-base 1 mm gap as a coordinate inference rather than validated maintained clearance.

## Rejected

- Reject any interpretation that the proposed 60 mm opening motion is demonstrated usable.
- Reject treating nominal bore differences, a 20-part count or a proposed assembly order as proof of fit, retention, usefulness or manufacturing readiness.
- Reject implicit holes, threads, fasteners, bearing features or a geometry change as a silent solution.

## Unresolved

- Opening-end interference, endpoint rod engagement, passages and fastening.
- Bushing allocation and fits; screw thread, thrust support, nut restraint and knob coupling.
- Loads, friction, motion protection, electrical integration and physical prototype validation.

## Next action

Obtain explicit interface and travel decisions before separate CAD construction and geometric review; preserve the supplied contract until any proposed revision is reviewed openly.

## Export timing

The runner exported these planning files after the model response. Later CAD compilation, measured geometry and rendering are separate operations with their own evidence. They are not physical testing.