# Benchtop XYZ inspection workstation Actual worker outputs; supplied dimensions are design constraints, not measurements. ## Mechanical integration, clearances and BOM interfaces — worker-a; bounded to workstation-dimensions and the mechanical contribution to workstation-question · gpt-6-sol - Investigation references are exactly workstation-question, workstation-dimensions and workstation-concept, each at contentRevision 1. Their supplied origins are human and their evidence statuses are unassessed. The mechanical contract is supplied design data, not measured geometry; workstation-concept is a candidate interface idea. - Coordinate basis: mm; X width, Y depth, Z up; origin at the base lower-front-left. The base occupies nominal X0–540, Y0–420, Z0–12. The deck minimum [140,50,56] and size [260,200,8] put its nominal underside at Z56. A standoff of supplied height 44 would span the difference from the base top at Z12, but its mounting and deck attachment are unspecified. - The Y rail centres are X70 and X470, with rails running Y30–390. The bridge minimum [50,180,310] and size [440,60,30] place its nominal X extent across both rail centres and its Y midpoint at the supplied gantry centre Y210. Rail-to-carriage, carriage-to-saddle, saddle-to-tower and tower-to-bridge attachments remain undefined; carriage spacing does not define motion endpoints. - The X rail runs nominally X65–475 at front Y164 and minimum Z318. Its proposed travel is 300 mm, not a defined endpoint pair or demonstrated stroke. The X carriage, X screw and focus backplate need specified attachment faces and moving-versus-fixed assignments. The Z rods have supplied length 120 mm; the proposed 30 mm focus travel likewise has no endpoint definition. - Functional subassemblies, not additional LIGHT modules: SA01 base/feet; SA02 Y guidance/carriages; SA03 gantry; SA04 X guidance/carriage/screw; SA05 Z guidance/screw; SA06 optics envelopes; SA07 deck/workholding; SA08 enclosure; SA09 controller housing; SA10 cable carrier. Proposed stable part-ID crosswalk: P01 base; P02 Y rail; P03 Y carriage; P04 Y saddle; P05 gantry tower; P06 bridge; P07 X rail; P08 X carriage; P09 X screw; P10 focus backplate; P11 focus rod; P12 focus screw; P13 camera-body envelope; P14 lens envelope; P15 ring-light envelope; P16 deck; P17 standoff; P18 rear panel; P19 side panel; P20 controller housing; P21 controller lid; P22 carrier link; P23 foot. These are identifiers for supplied elements, not a claim that every element is a separately manufactured component. - Provisional BOM quantities supported by explicit counts or singular named elements: P01 1, P02 2, P06 1, P07 1, P08 1, P09 1, P10 1, P11 2, P12 1, P13–P16 1 each, P17 4, P18 1, P20 1, P21 1, P22 12 and P23 4. P03–P05 and P19 quantities remain unresolved; count no vent as a separate part merely because ventCount is 8. Mounts, fasteners, workholding fixtures, motors, bearings and connectors have no supplied BOM specification or supported quantity. Purchased-component shapes are nominal envelopes, not vendor-qualified selections. - Exactly three named LIGHT modules, with exactly two proposed acceptance-question slots each: base and motion structure — (1) assembly/interface review: are the named rail, carriage, gantry, X and Z interfaces identified? (2) manual positioning/clearance review: are declared positions and unresolved endpoints distinguishable from checked clearances?; workholding/optics/enclosure interfaces — (1) fixture/optics setup review: do deck reference and optics envelope agree with the declared setup? (2) enclosure/cable/service access review: are panel, controller and carrier access questions recorded?; local staff inspection record and service handoff — (1) record/setup-reference review: do references match the staff-declared setup? (2) handoff reconciliation review: can staff identify and resolve stale or incomplete records? These are slots and questions, not full stories or evidence. - Proposed worker-b setup-reference manifest M-SETUP-r1: contract identity tce-cookbook-mechanical-design-v1 / inspection-workstation, locked parameters unchanged; the three node IDs at revision 1; SA01–SA10 and P01–P23 crosswalk above; fixture reference FX-DECK-GRID-r1, meaning a proposed reference to P16's supplied grid rather than an added fixture; synthetic inspection ID; explicitly staff-declared manual X, gantry-Y and focus-Z setup state without inferred coordinates; and flags for unresolved endpoints, mounting, optics overlap, enclosure access and carrier route. Worker-b owns the record fields and synthetic inspection-ID assignment; staff declare physical setup changes, reconcile mismatches and acknowledge handoff. M-SETUP-r1 is a proposed manifest revision, not a revision of the locked contract. - Proposed later evidence requests to the separate geometry builder: identified assembly, exploded and relevant section views; source-linked image references IMG-ASM, IMG-EXP and IMG-SEC with builder as future owner and all three marked pending; actual placed-part counts, distinct non-fastener-design counts, functional-subassembly counts and model bounds; and measured interference/clearance reports at defined motion endpoints. The targets of 60–100 placed components, at least 25 distinct non-fastener designs and at least 8 functional subassemblies remain unchecked targets, not reasons to add BOM items. ### Recommendations - Ask the later builder to define endpoint and moving-part assumptions before checking Y carriage/gantry, X carriage/screw and Z guide/screw sweeps. Review the X rail-to-carriage face, screw-to-carriage drive interface, focus mounting and camera-to-focus connection separately from any measured clearance result. - Request sections and access views for deck holes and standoffs, fixture reach, optics-to-backplate spacing, controller lid and eight vent features, rear/side panels, twelve-link carrier routing from its supplied start, and cable/service access. Record analytic questions now; reserve pass/fail and distances for later geometry evidence. - Use synthetic record-transition cases only: matching manifest and fixture references may permit staff confirmation; a changed fixture, changed manifest, stale browser view or missing image reference should block confirmation pending reconciliation; incomplete handoff should remain unacknowledged. These are expected record outcomes, not executed tests. Neither confirmation, export nor acknowledgement verifies physical setup or permits energized operation. ### Concerns - Potential explicit geometry conflict: if P13's 32 × 32 body is centred on the supplied optics axis X270/Y110, its Y extent is 94–126 and Z extent is 190–230. The unrelieved P10 backplate spans Y124–132 and Z164–344, so their nominal solid envelopes overlap. Camera-body placement and the intended mounting relief are unresolved; do not silently move either. - Potential explicit geometry conflict: if P15's ring is centred on that same axis, its outside diameter reaches Y134 and its Z span is 158–168. The backplate begins at Y124 and Z164, so portions of a nominal unrelieved ring and plate can intersect. Ring attachment, centring and relief require a defined interface and later section check. - Y carriage count and locations, X and Z travel endpoints, gantry tower footprints, side-panel placement, controller mounting, carrier path/end connection, cable bend and service clearances, and foot Z placement are absent. The supplied dimensions do not resolve them. The controller nominally spans X360–515, Y286–386, Z12–70; the rear panel starts at Y400, but that separation alone establishes no service access. - The record-to-image crosswalk has no produced image source yet: IMG-ASM, IMG-EXP and IMG-SEC are pending builder references, not existing files. FX-DECK-GRID-r1 is a proposed setup reference, not a supplied workholding part. Missing references must remain flagged rather than treated as verified. ## Staff web inspection log, human service handoff and workstation interfaces · gpt-6-sol - Exactly three investigation nodes are in scope: workstation-question, workstation-dimensions and workstation-concept, each at content revision 1. Their supplied provenance is retained; their evidence status is unassessed. The dimensions node contains supplied design constraints, not measurements. - The LIGHT outline has exactly three modules, each with two story slots: (1) base and motion structure—base/Y-motion reference; gantry/X/Z-motion reference. (2) workholding/optics/enclosure interfaces—deck/fixture and optics reference; enclosure/controller and cable-routing reference. (3) local staff inspection record and service handoff—staff setup-reference confirmation; staff service handoff/review. Functional subassemblies are not additional modules. - The staff module needs one identifier crosswalk, owned by the mechanical integration record: its part IDs, subassembly names and BOM entries map to fixture/setup references and the selected manifest revision. The inspection record cites that crosswalk and the locked contract revision; optional synthetic image-reference IDs require a defined local source and owner. No worker-a identifier list was supplied here, so no parallel part IDs or fixture names are assigned. - Proposed minimal synthetic record: inspection ID; setup reference; fixture reference; contract revision; selected manifest revision; optional synthetic image-reference IDs; explicit staff-check entries with outcome and discrepancy text; record revision; inspection state; handoff status. No names or customer fields. - The locked contract uses mm and X width, Y depth, Z up, with the base lower-front-left as origin. Interface questions remain explicit: the specified X carriage ends at Y164 while the X rail begins at Y164, so engagement is not established by those envelopes; the focus backplate ends at Y132 while the X carriage begins at Y140, leaving an attachment interface unspecified. Neither observation is a measured clearance or a change to either parameter. ### Recommendations - Use browser-local metadata storage and an explicit JSON export of synthetic records. Do not use cloud storage, external uploads, real images, authentication, instrument links or machine control. Browser-local data is limited to that browser/profile and may be cleared; an exported file is a separate copy that can become stale and must not be treated as the latest stored revision. - Before setup confirmation, staff must compare the currently selected setup manifest and contract references with the latest locally stored record revision and its fixture/setup references. A stale view, missing referenced item or mismatch blocks record confirmation only. The setup operator declares manual adjustments or fixture changes; a staff reviewer reconciles discrepancies against the selected manifest; the setup operator repeats checks and confirms a renewed record revision. Matching references do not verify the actual workstation. - Proposed transition table, not implemented: Draft → Ready for confirmation: setup operator; requires selected manifest, defined references and completed explicit checks; reject missing references or incomplete checks. Ready → Confirmed: setup operator; requires comparison with latest stored revision and matching selected manifest, contract, fixture and setup references; reject stale view, changed manifest/fixture or unresolved discrepancy. Confirmed → Review required: setup operator declares a manual adjustment or fixture change; reject retaining the prior confirmation as current. Review required → Ready: staff reviewer reconciles references and open discrepancies, then setup operator repeats checks; reject unresolved mismatch. Confirmed → Handoff offered: setup operator; requires a declared setup, open-discrepancy list and referenced record/image IDs; reject incomplete handoff. Handoff offered → Acknowledged: receiving service staff; requires review of those references and explicit acknowledgement; reject missing references or unacknowledged discrepancies. Acknowledgement is receipt, not physical verification. - Propose synthetic transition cases for later review: matching references permit record confirmation; changed fixture, changed manifest and stale browser view block it pending staff reconciliation; a missing listed image reference blocks confirmation until the reference is resolved or removed by staff revision; an incomplete handoff blocks acknowledgement. These are expected record outcomes, not executed tests or physical protection. - Request separate analytic interface review and later measured geometry checks for motion endpoints, carriage/gantry and focus/optics interfaces, deck/workholding access, enclosure/controller access and cable-carrier routing. The separate CAD builder must check the future targets of 60–100 placed components, at least 25 different non-fastener designs and at least 8 functional subassemblies without BOM padding. ### Concerns - The worker-a identifier registry and ownership assignments are not supplied in this material. Part-to-BOM, subassembly-to-fixture, manifest-to-contract and image-to-record references must remain unresolved until that shared crosswalk is available. - The specified X rail/carriage and focus backplate/carriage Y relationships do not establish their mechanical attachments. Do not resolve them by moving locked geometry or inventing brackets. Other nominal envelopes likewise provide no measured motion clearance, optics performance or access result. - A log state, matching reference, JSON export or receiving-role acknowledgement does not establish physical setup, permission for energized operation or tested protection. No browser software, physical test, deployed workflow or CAD validation is claimed. ## Final integration Integrated the two actual reviews into one bounded LIGHT package. The supplied mechanicalDesign is retained unchanged as a proposed parameter contract, not compiled CAD. No check, geometry result, physical test or application implementation is claimed.