# Orchestrator review

Actual model decisions for a light draft. No human approval or executed product test is implied.

Integrated the two actual reviews into one bounded LIGHT package. The supplied mechanicalDesign is retained unchanged as a proposed parameter contract, not compiled CAD. No check, geometry result, physical test or application implementation is claimed.

## Accepted

- Worker-a's P01–P23 and SA01–SA10 crosswalk, conservative BOM quantities and separation of subassemblies from modules.
- Worker-a's conditional optics conflicts, undefined motion/interface questions and requests for later assembly, exploded, section, count and bounds evidence.
- Worker-b's local-only metadata, explicit JSON export, latest-revision comparison and staff-owned transitions.
- Both workers' prohibition on interpreting a matching record, export or acknowledgement as physical verification or permission to operate.
- Both workers' requirement that complexity targets remain future checks rather than achieved results.

## Changed

- Resolved worker-b's unavailable-crosswalk concern using the actual worker-a identifiers supplied here; no parallel vocabulary was introduced.
- Selected worker-a's assembly/interface and positioning/clearance story split for M1, rather than worker-b's alternate grouping by motion axes.
- Made the storage proposal specific: IndexedDB metadata with transactional revision checks, explicit JSON download and no import in this scope.
- Separated inspectionState from handoffStatus and invalidated current receipt after a declared setup, fixture or manifest change.
- Narrowed the missing-image blocker: optional pending catalogue entries do not block; unresolved images actually listed in a record do.
- Separated reference discrepancies, which block confirmation, from declared engineering limitations, which remain visible and require acknowledgement. This permits a synthetic record demonstration without implying mechanical approval.
- Future builder must document missing endpoint and moving-part definitions and return them for review, rather than silently choosing geometry.

## Rejected

- Blanket blocking of every record merely because optional future geometry images have not yet been produced.
- Any interpretation of nominal envelopes or analytic gaps as proven fit, clearance, usable motion or service access.
- Any implied authority to repair conflicts through shifted geometry, invented brackets, reliefs or BOM padding.
- Treating part counts, renderings, record confirmation or handoff receipt as evidence of usefulness, manufacturing readiness or operational protection.

## Unresolved

- Camera/backplate and ring/backplate conflicts remain conditional on centered, unrelieved nominal envelopes; no geometry was changed.
- Rail engagement, backplate attachment, screw connections, endpoints, Y quantities and placements, panel placement and carrier routing remain undefined.
- Fits, materials, masses, loads, stability, motion protection, electrical integration and prototype validation remain open.
- Workholding hardware is unspecified; FX-DECK-GRID-r1 is only a proposed reference to the deck grid.
- Geometry summary massG values are schema placeholders only, not engineering data; actual masses remain unknown and must not be consumed as zero-mass estimates.
- All future images, geometry evidence and synthetic workflow checks remain pending.

## Next action

Have one reviewer execute Wave 1's document review, confirm the crosswalk and record unresolved interfaces without changing the contract; then specify Wave 2's record transitions. Separately authorize CAD/source generation and validation only after missing definitions receive explicit review.

## Export timing

The runner exported these planning files after the model response. Later CAD compilation, measured geometry and rendering are separate operations with their own evidence. They are not physical testing.